Freemasonry and Bloodlines

Freemasonry and Bloodlines
© Crucible Media Inc. 2016.

“And what is the Collective Unconscious? It is the “Memory of the Blood,” or rather, a “memory that goes through the blood,” that acts on earth by means of the blood.

There is nothing more mysterious than blood. Paracelsus saw it as a condensation of light. I believe the Aryan, Hyperborean blood is not the light of the Golden Sun, of a galactic sun, but of the light of the Black Sun, of the Green Ray.

It is not the “light of the Akashic Archives,” but of another universe. The Akashic Archives belong to the Enemy. If the Hyperborean Memory of the Blood can be penetrated, then the Voice would awake and recover the Vril, thus breaking the Eternal Return”
– Miguel Serrano

Resources:
https://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Freemasonry.htm#OTO
https://archive.fo/pwDqL

http://freemasonrywatch.org
https://archive.fo/Gazwl

Ordo Templi Orientis
https://www.parareligion.ch
https://archive.fo/mZUs

Masonic texts online
http://www.sacred-texts.com/mas/index.htm
https://archive.fo/PFsSu

Compendium of Masonic rituals
https://www.stichtingargus.nl/vrijmetselarij/ritualen_en.html
https://archive.fo/f5K5Z

The Grand Lodges of Freemasonry are wholly Jewish. Freemasonry is based on the secret Kabbalistic teachings of the Judaic Craft. Judaism is Masonry and Masonry is Judaism. The Invisible College is a collective past man of European ancestry inherit, a dying history now only seemingly relevant in conspiracy theories and digital media. Our blood memory is a primer to awaken the species from evolutionary stasis. This awakening from historic sleep of stasis set on Mankind by the Jewish curse of globalism.

Information paroxysm in the digital age has peeled back far too much information and data, becoming a closed affair in the academic theaters of learning. Anti-Masonry as a vestige of European Christian reaction originates with Roman Catholicism and emerges from its ecclesiastical institutions which rightfully view Masonry as a challenge to their spiritual monopoly in politics. Roman Catholic condemnation of Masonry was then uncritically transferred over to the Protestants who continue to parrot papist anti-Masonic conspiracies and who ever since this transference began seeing a Mason under every rock and tree. The core error at all the misdirection is the failure to name Freemasonry’s main conspirator: International Jewry.

Anti-Masonic sentiments with its conspiratorial narrative about the world has no native roots or pedigree in MENA or much of Asia until the early-mid 20th century. Since that time it has gained wide traction and has become an entrenched conspirological feature in assorted discourse without naming Jewish influence. For example, in the popular culture of Iran today you cannot escape discussions about the state of the world without some reference to Freemasons being behind every rock, the “Protocols” and the closely related “Rothschilds.” While the Islamic Republic did not introduce any of these narratives into Iranian society, because they were already there under the Pahlavis, elements within the IRI have however normalized them in the popular media and print.

While none of this is dismisses the Jewish influence of secret societies in our world, particularly those of them who have ill intent (and who do in fact exist; say, for example, the Order of the Nine Angles, the Ordo Templi Orientis, NXIVM), the fact of the matter is that people who wholesale subscribe to such anti-Masonic narratives are falling into a modern Gnostic dualist trap whilst also validating the longstanding political vendettas of the Church against its rivals.

Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Miguel Serrano, and Savitri Devi mention in their writings an Invisible College transmitting VRIL knowledge to men who seek it in this world and the next. One can attain access to the Invisible College by self- study, initiating into the Invisible School; to heal, to struggle, to learn and reclaim racial memory. The greater part of this Authentic Tradition, in one form or another, has existed for centuries…actually forever…out in the open and concurrently in plain sight.

It is the only true tradition and Secret Society – the Invisible College, the only occult school where you must initiate yourself and understand codified language and memetic magic. When the time comes for the inner awakening, as it may be called, all sorts of synchronicities, as Jung might call them, occur which lead them inevitably in the right direct-ion, to the Invisible College. Initiates of Vril power and the Third Eye; they reproduce sexually and by means of plasmic emanations from their ethereal bodies; the divine light of the Black Sun courses through their veins.

A Phillip Marlowesque search for hidden mysteries leads men to the darkweb and unbroken research into our collective Hyperborean Past. My search started with books, has deepened over the years with books, world travel, real-life mentors and connections. What are the true secrets of Freemasonry? Just what is it about the lure of the Lodge that has driven people to search and seek, to speculate, to make wild conjectures, to shrink in terror, to become Wise, and perhaps, to engage in the blackest of rituals?

What story or meme draws you to the Secret? Bohemian Grove? Owl Worship? The Secret Cabal? Jews? The New World Order? The Jesuits? The Illuminati? The Rockefellers? Prieuré de Sion? The Knights Templar? The mysterious alignments of certain sacred sites? Ancient Astronauts and Atlantean Adepts? The Nephilim? Zeta Reticuli Greys? Joseph Smith’s Masonic biography? Spermo- Gnostics and Neo-Templars? Orgone Tantra? At the end of your journey, in whichever crucible you become entangled in, you must must come to terms with your past, and the collective past of racial memory.

Masonic teachings are open and readily available often creating obsessed infamies and controlled conspiracies leading one away from International Jewry. When all the synchronicities and brain-evolution systems of initiation are assembled in one place, I conclude that unbroken lines of transmission are untenable. What I have uncovered, and hope to demonstrate is a historical thread of Judaism and Kabbalistic teachings in the earliest Masonic lodges. Kabbalistic teachings found in Masonic lodges condemn the Hyperborean Lineage to a broken world, a Shell of Shells that Freemasonry claims to it alone can repair.

It is a genuine Authentic Tradition of invisible schools acting as repositories for Vril Society knowledge that excite conspiracy brokers and often deteriorates their logic and sanity. Timeless texts of Western philosophy and mythology become tomes of prophecy to these people, for the general tone of these fanatics is Orwellian. Fanatics and intelligence puppets like Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, David Icke, Texe Marrs and other buffoons who revel in Orwellian fear incite a perverted picture of reality without naming the source puppeteering their fears: the International Jew.

They seek the New World Order without naming its Jewish masters, because it makes them feel significant. It gives them a crusade to fight. They give it life, to cover up their culpability in inciting commercialized panic. Their followers and “truth-teams” disseminate Orwellian panic by attaching prophetic conspiracy to often-innocent systems. The only deterrent to their commercializing fear is an interdisciplinary approach that permits one to isolate and contrast disparate traditions across space and idea. One putting this puzzle together must link data and connect synchronicities between people, events, and phenomena widely divorced from each other.

One can just as easily synthesize people, events, and phenomena in uncovering our collective past by keeping with the principle of karma. The karma or cause-effect matrix of these orders, organizations, lodges, guilds, and sects is not less exempt from consequences than the karma of the individual. Freemasonry calls itself the Royal Art, ostensibly because it ostentatiously claims its Grand Lodges, “Noble of all the Arts and Sciences.” Rosicrucianism, too, has been called the Royal Art, and so has Alchemy. The metaphysical pandering to curious non-Freemasons stems from deep connection to International Jewry.

Masonry, as it evolved, was the Craft of Building Temples, Palaces, and cathedrals. Its philosophical teaching related to borderless International Government of the Individual, of Society. Their use of Power stemmed from Judaic ethos. It is contrary to the Western Mystery School’s Art of Civilization. Masonry was performed in accordance with Judaic-tested rules pertaining to specific proportions, angles, measurements designed with Deity in Mind. According to Rabbinical philosophy adopted by their Freemason camarilla, perfectly designed Temple ensured the Indwelling of it by its Deity.

This building was built directionally pleasing to the Deity, to the Priests, to the Worshippers. Usually, the orientation would be towards the Equinoxes or Solstices. In addition, ley-lines would be utilized. In short, the building was to be harmony with Heaven and Earth. “Wise Government,” a world government engineered by International Jewry. The human species was instructed in the arts of civilization, agriculture, medicine, metallurgy, and all the other arts and sciences it needed to progress, to grow, and develop; Freemasonry sought to arrogate the teachings of the Invisible Schools to their own ends; a confluence with International Jewry.

Religious ritual was a means of concealing the secrets of building in such a manner that the practicing of the liturgy was synonymous with the practice of the art, craft or trade which came under the patronage of the specific Deity. In this way, Ptah (EnKi) was the patron of blacksmiths, the science of metallurgy, and artisans in general. The practitioners would consecrate their Work to Ptah; their daily routine would be analogous to the Ritual His Priests performed.

The religious observance would remind the practitioner of the work he had performed. The tools of the craft became sacred objects. The stories and legends pertaining to the Gods contained elements relating to their Craft, so that the Mason practiced in his mind the religion as he labored, and the labor he did endorsed, through paying honor to his patron Deity via worship or communion.

When Freemason Albert Pike 33° reformed the Scottish Rite, over a half century had passed since the various rites were amalgamated into the Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite. This system was derived from several rites of High-Grade Freemasonry which sprang up in continental Europe during the early 18th Century. These rites were sympathetic to the House of Stuart’s claims, to the throne of Scotland, and to the throne of England. This is partly why it is called the Scottish Rite.

When, in 1717, the Grand Lodge of England was formed, there were groups who belonged to a more ancient Freemasonry. These traditional Masons were tricked by James Anderson, into accepting him as a member, who then went on to change the passwords and times of meeting, and excommunicated traditional initiates. Anderson and his company went on to establish the Grand Lodge. A number of the more traditional Freemasons schismed off in 1745, the year of the “Uprising,” and became known as the ‘Ancients.’ The Hanoverians were known as the Moderns.

Running concurrently with this schism was the development of various rites including Ramsay’s Rite, founded by Andrew Michael “Chevalier” Ramsay; the Rite of the Vielle Bru; the Chapter of Clermont; the Primordial Chapter of Arras, said to have been founded by Bonnie Prince Charlie himself; the Knights of the East; the Emperors of the East and West; The Rite of the Seven Degrees in London, established by Peter Lambert de Lintot; The Rite of Perfection; The Strict Observance, Philalethes Society, Philadelphes, Amis Reunis, and others. The entire corpus of Masonic ritual was cut out of the official Grand Lodge system, established by pro-Hanoverians.

Albert Pike held that True Scottish Rite Masonry was allied with the Ancients or ‘Schismatics’ and that they held the correct order of Jachin and Boaz. The correct pronunciations of the words, and that the Hanoverian usurpers had changed everything around so that the Lodges would be closed to the “Ancient” Masons. This theme is demonstrated to be historically accurate, by the materials scholar John Yarker cites, and Gould’s eminent research.

Sepher ha’Debarim is the Hebrew title Albert Pike applied to The Book of the Words, 1° – 32°. Sepher ha’Debarim is a piece of etymological research into the origins and meanings of the words employed in the rituals of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. The tome was originally printed along with the Rituals, Liturgies, Legendas, Readings, Morals and Dogma, for the use of the Consistories in each State, under the Southern Masonic Jurisdiction of the A.A.S.R.

The Book of Words indicates that the word Free Mason was, in fact, in existence long before the alleged founding of Grand Lodge in 1717 ^A.D. More than 350 years prior to Grand Lodge, Edward III set up regulations pertaining to the Free Masons. In Gould’s monumental History of Freemasonry, Volume II, we can find some interesting quotations upon this subject, which are too lengthy and numerous to deal with here, and not in keeping with the present subject. The same thing can be said of John Yarker’s The Arcane Schools, which contains some interesting historical data upon the shadowy history of Freemasonry, which every interested student of history should obtain.

Book of the Words is the capstone in the secret instructions of the A.A.S.R., available originally to Consistories only. Pike regards the ‘Ancient’ Masonry of Laurence Dermott as either more authentic than the so-called “Modern” Masonry of Anderson and Desaguliers which catered to Hanoverian interests, or he is at least demonstrating that it is just as” authentic.” This discussion reaches a climax when he analyzes the word Shibboleth on pages 47 – 49. Pike is a pro-Jacobite; therefore it is not surprising for us to see him support Dermott’s Masonry.

The societies of the elder world perished through the materialistic of castes engineered by Masonic coalitions of International Jewry, becoming petrified on their own part, isolating the common people in a hopeless reprobation and reserving the reins of political power to a small number of Freemasons, so that it was deprived of that circulation which is the principle of progress, motion and life. Political power that ruled without antagonism and without concurrence, and consequently without control, proved fatal to the Sacerdotal Royalties; while newly created Freemason “Republics,” on the other hand, perished by the conflict of liberties and Patriciate, that in the absence of all duty hierarchically sanctioned and enforced, had soon become mere tyrannies, rivals one of the other.

The Templars had two doctrines, one concealed and reserved for the Masters, which was Johannism; the other public, which was Roman Catholicism. They deceived the adversaries whom they sought to supplant. Freemasonry’s world teachings allegedly begin with the Dionysian Architects or the German Stone-workers, adopting Saint John the Evangelist as one of its Patrons, associating with him, in order not to arouse the suspicions of Rome, Saint John the Baptist, covertly proclaiming their Rites and Lodges lineage to the Kabbalah and Essenism.

The Successors of the Rose-Croix Orders, abandoning by degrees the austere and hierarchical Science of their Ancestors in Initiation, became a Mystic Sect, contiguous with the Templars, the dogmas of the two intermingling. They believed themselves to be the sole depositaries of the secrets of the Gospel of St. John. The Rose-Croix, in fact, thought in the eighteenth Century that their time had arrived, some chartered a new hierarchy, others to overturn all authority, and to compress all the summits of the Social Order under the level of Judaic Utilitarianism.

The Rose-Croix claims they are the legitimate authors of Freemasonry, to all of whose symbols they give a hermetical interpretation. The Masons, they say, came into England under King Arthur. Raymond Lully initiated Henry IV. The Grand Masters were formerly designated, by the titles of JOHN II, III, IV, and I. The Oriental Rite of Memphis first appeared in 1838 when Jacques Etienne Marconis de Negre first established the Grand Lodge Osiris in Brussels.

The underlying legend of the rite was that it descended from the Dionysian and Egyptian mysteries. The sage Ormus is said to have combined the mysteries with Christianity to produce the original Rose-Croix. The Oriental Rite of Memphis was a system of ninety-seven degrees, producing such August titles as Commander of the Luminous Triangle, Sublime Prince of the Royal Mystery, Sublime Pastor of the Hutz, Doctor of the Planispheres, and so on.

According to Baron de Westerode, the founder of the Rosicrucians was one Ormesius, who had been converted by St. Mark, at Alexandria, in ^A.D. 46. He purified the Egyptian Rites, and reconciled them with Christianity, carrying his disciples with him, and founded the Society of Ormus, or of the Light, each member wearing a red cross. To this society the Essenes and Therapeutae joined themselves and conserved the Masonic Secrets. The mystical meanings of the Rose as a Symbol are to be looked for in the Cabbalistic Commentaries on the Canticles.

The origins of Freemasonry are lost in the mists of occult history mingling with Judaic mysticism. There are scholars who believe that it can be traced no further back than the mediaeval guilds of operative masons, though some regarded these in turn as relics of the Roman Collegia. There are still circumspect scholars who know better than to believe spurious theories, though students of the Ancient Mysteries who are also Freemasons are aware that it is along the lines of speculative Masonry that we find deeper connections to International Judaism.

There is sufficient data in operative ceremonies and teachings which could have had no significance for the mason of the Blue Lodge, though when examined by the light of the knowledge received in the Mysteries it is replete with meaning. Many Masonic scholars claim various degrees of antiquity for the Craft, some assigning its foundation to King Solomon, and one at least boldly stating that its wisdom is all that now remains of the divine knowledge that mythic Adam possessed before his fall.

Centuries ago, a real Mysticism existed within the Symbolic Masonry and a legend that all the Degrees of Ancient Mystic Masonry are in possession of the Olden Fraternity, Sons of Osiris. The Universal Science and the Sublime Philosophy once taught in the Greater Mysteries of Egypt, Chaldea, Persia, and Babylon {and now in the Priesthood of Aeth} and among the many other nations of antiquity, is a dead letter in modern Freemasonry. The Mason, however, is the last person to refuse the Invisible College once existed, for the simple reason that the whole superstructure of Free-Masonry is the spiritual opposite of the Invisible College. Masonic rituals serve as its living monument to an ancient Judaic curse.

Despite the derision with which the term “occult sciences” is negligently applied to Masonry, if it had not been for Judaism, Masonry would not exist. Masonry teaches Kabbalistic magic and mysticism through Psychic manipulation. They are perversions of the authentic heritage due to the degrading hand of Constantine. In the early Church Theology, as in the Secret Doctrine, there was not one Christ for the whole world, but a potential Christ in every man.

Theologians first made a fetish of an impersonal, then tore the Christos from the hearts of humanity in order to deify Jesus, that Jews might have a God made peculiarly to their own satisfaction, in their traffic in Souls. It is a traffic of souls, the forerunners of Masonry professed, where souls awaken within the rays of the Black Sun.

According to speculative Masonry, these sparks of heavenly fire, or shards of God become Souls, and as the effect must share in the nature of the cause, the ethereal fire that warms into life, also illuminates into Light, a consciousness living state that reformats the human brain. The development of the human species concurrently with a latent propensity for spirituality in the human genome is no coincidence. As species developed on Earths with the capacity to support organic life forms, heaven, supplies the demand.

As the human species groaned for lordship as superior beings to rule over other species, forgotten appealing to initiates with indescribable longings for knowledge, monumental powers to be “as gods.” In this appeal, the soul is obligated into realms of matter by probationary states in various timelines. The secret lodges of Free-Masonry were collected and kept hidden in depositories with complete chains of documents, together with the Kabbalistic teachings of their lodges. This chain of esoteric depositories remains locked away in the secret crypts of libraries belonging to ancient Masons among them, the true Rosie Croix Fraternity, responsible for keeping their tomes intact.

A knowledge of the history of Mystic Rites is necessary to enable recognition of the Master Mason, Hiram, the Ausar {Osiris} of the Egyptians, Mithras of the Persians, Bacchus of the Greeks, Atys of the Phrygians, all who celebrated passion, death, and the resurrection centuries before Christians recognized the passion of the Christ Jesus. With the building guilds of the Middle Ages, a secret science was transmitted including their art, the bedrock of which was the Christian mystery of the Holy Ghost, a sort of preparatory for Saint John’s Masonry, a system of moral philosophy.

The Mystic Rites of York and Memphis Misräim blossomed from these building guilds, identical with the legend of the Carpocratians. It is the legend that Jesus Christ chose a select few of his Apostles and confided in them a secret science, which in turn was eventually transmitted to the Knights Templar, Crucigeri, and the Cathars. This sacred science added to persistently by occult fraternities of the Invisible College lived on in the heart of the Knights Templars until their abolition and persecutions. Among the Templars were Rosie Croix initiates who transmitted the sacred science down in unbroken lines of teaching.

It is difficult to abolish the Rosie Croix Fraternities, as an initiated Rosicrucian is only known to one or a few. The Rosy Cross Brotherhood attempted unsuccessfully to prevent their sacred science from being interrupted or subverted. With the passage of time and human affairs, the old Orders changed, old systems were reintegrated into new ones and the Black Sun that shone on our collective history veiled itself in new hues.

It is difficult at times; no doubt other scholars and writers trying to pull back the lense on the Western Mystery Tradition share a common difficulty in discerning the Authentic Heritage. Unless one has the correct keys, the clamour of various “occult organizations” is deafening, witness the incessant lineage and trademark disputes of modern day Golden Dawn institutions. The outward expressions of Judaic black magic and Kabbalism become difficult to detect, more so the case with Masonry and its tenebrous origins.

The Johannine lineage was the forerunner of much intrigue and accusations of heresy in the fourteenth century. True occultism is effectively religious in nature and observances. Occult traditions and mystic sects were heirlooms of our collective past when the early Christian era dawned, their Gnosis later rejected by the Constantinian Church. The Gnosis that researchers into the Heritage discern can be traced from epoch to epoch, an important point in the formation of Free-Masonry.

Equally important in the development of Free-Masonry are communities and fraternities of the Middle Ages, which progressively taught the Gnosis rejected centuries earlier. One of these brotherhoods was that of the Waldenses, Gnostic teachings by Peter Waldo which began in the year 1170, at Lyons. Not surprisingly, they were later branded heretics for primarily their doctrine of metempsychosis. Pope Lucias III excommunicated them, and Sextus IV, in 1477, proclaimed a Crusade against them. I favor Gnostic traditions like the Waldenses, Albigenses, Bogomils, and Cathari developing contiguously with the rayonnement des troubadours, the Troubadour traditions of song and canticle.

Scholars uncovered traces of the Troubadour tradition linked to Gnostic fraternities like the Bogomils, Patarenes, the Waldenses, Anabaptists, and in Russia the Strigolniki, Molokani and Doukhobors. Bohemia and Hungary were historic fertile soil for Mystic Fraternities and societies of occult ‘tendencies.’ Among them were: ‘Die Bruder von Reif und Hammer,’ or ‘Brothers’ of the Circle and Hammer,’ ‘Die Hackebrudershaft,’ or ‘The Brotherhood of the Hatchet,’ ‘Die Freunde Vom Kreuz,’ or ‘Friends of the Cross.’

A great moulding force was exercised at this period on the form of Freemasonry by Jan Amos Komensky {latinized as Comenius}, who was born at Brunn, in Bohemia in 1592, and became a Chaplain of the Bohemian Brothers in 1618. When the civil wars began, Komensky lost wife, child and property, and was exiled from Austria like all other non-Catholics. He escaped to Poland, turned his thoughts to educational matters and received recognition in Sweden, Hungary and England.

Jan Amos Komensky was actively interested in the Rosicrucian movement and joined John Valentinus Andreas, the reformer and literati of the Rosicrucian Fraternity, in his work in the Fama Fraternitatis. In 1650, Komensky was invited to Hungary and Transylvania by the Prince Ragozcy, where he stayed four years.

It doubtless partly owes to his influence that the Rosicrucian movement spread so widely in these countries. His philosophical and mystical views were so widely spread, that when Anderson wrote his book on Freemasonry, he incorporated in his work a compilation of the most essential portions of the plans of Komensky.

A manuscript of Michael Mayer’s exists in the Library at the University of Leyden, which sets forth that in 1570^A.D. the society of the old Magical Brethren, or ‘Wise Men,’ was revived under the name of the Brethren of the Golden Rosy Cross, highly significant in the adjoining formation of Masonry and Rosie-Crucianism. Baron Hans Ecker von Eckhoffen, in his treatise on fraternal associations that was known as the Asiatiche Brueder, says: “Their writings date from 1510, showing that a body of Mystics was known at that period.”

The Knights of Asia also called themselves the Knights of St. John and it is a curious fact to notice that one of the Masonic records which has caused a deluge of dissertation and also of dissension, amongst Masons, is the celebrated ‘Cologne Record,’ which is dated 1535 and in which an Order of St. John is noticed.

This Charter has been a veritable bone of contention between operative and Speculative Masons, and much polemical literature has been published on the subject. More mystic Masons, those who are speculative, are in agreement on external and internal evidences; the operatists reject it, as they reject all such evidence.” In the record there is the name of Philip Melanchthon; a friend and co-worker of Martin Luther – who appears in the Order of Masons.

This document bears witness also that a Christian secret society was recognized in various parts of the world, which existed before 1440 under the name of the ‘Brotherhood of St John.’ Until 1535, the society was recognized under the title of, St. John’s Order of Freemasonry. St. John’s Order of Freemasonry was reformed and rearranged in an operative form, in the year 1717 the generally accepted date of the modern Masonic philosophy.

Before we uncover a more direct development of speculative and operative Masonry, more stones must be uncovered in Freemasonry. The currents of an Authentic Heritage thread, as I mention into a labyrinth of collective histories called the Petrine, Pauline and Johannite traditions. The Johannine tradition according to Masonry scholars Massey {Lectures} and Yarker {Arcane Schools} stems from the Essenes, a sect that has puzzled historians and intrigued academics.

Jews believe they are the Assideans, Chassidim, or old believers allied with the Maccabees; afterwards dividing into two Rites, or the practical, and contemplative members. Other writers consider that they were Egyptian priests, fleeing into Syria by the conquests of Cambyses of Persia, and Alexander the Great, one can assume logically that this theory is partly correct, and that they may have included Jesus ben Panther, a nephew of Queen Salome.

Their doctrines were delivered orally, and they took oaths of Secrecy, Chastity, and Justice in all affairs. A select class of Essenes were called Therapeutæ, healers first and foremost; recall the Rosie Croix philosophers, their first duty to men and women: to heal, and that gratis. It would appear that there were branches of the Therapeutæ, who became actual Christians; Nazarenes, Ebionites, and Nabatheans, and the first term is in use in the Eastern Roman Provinces to designate Christians, who first took that name at Antioch.

Other Therapeutæ keeping their Gnostic lineages, did flee into Syria and Arabia where they indoctrinated into Koreish, ‘Guardians of the Kaaba” and Roshaniyya, “helpers” sects of mystical Islam, many of their initiates descendants of Ishmael. Secret Societies under Muslim protectorate or domain, called Zalouahs existed, tracing their mystic rites in sects called the Isma’ili and Nusayri.

The Tariq {Arabic: Society, a sect} of the House of Wisdom was founded at Cairo, Egypt and had seven Initiatory degrees. The House of Wisdom accepted, what was the Gnostic Kabbalist doctrine, of the Aeons, or Sefirot; emanations of Godhood, applying the teachings to the successors of the Prophet of Arabia, upholding Ismael as the founder of his Path, and one of the Prophet’s descendants as the Seventh Imam. This Adept created ‘Dais,’ or Missionaries, for the propagation of the Teaching, and was succeeded by his son, then grandson. An Adept whose name we only have as ‘Karmath’ brought the Path into repute.

The Secret Institution now later seated at Cairo and reconstituted as the Dar-al-hiqmet, “Tent of Skill,” or “House of Wisdom,” and Assemblies were held twice a week, when all the members appeared clothed in white shrouds. The Adepts advanced gradually through a series of Seven degrees, over which presided a Dai’al‘uat’ar Missionary of Missionaries.

Their Caliph {Outer Head of the Order, or Chief}, Hakem bin emir’Illah increased these degrees to nine and erected, in 1004 ^A.D., a stately building which he abundantly furnished with mathematical instruments. In 1123 ^A.D. the Vizier Afdhal destroyed the building, but meetings continued elsewhere.

Corresponding with the seven {or nine} degrees of the Society was a Seven-fold gradation of Adepts; Sheik, or Grand Master; Dai’el’Keber, or Deputy; Dai, or Master or Fellow; Fida’i, or Agent; Lassiq, or Aspirant; Mumini, or Believer. The Initiate was successively taught that there had been seven holy Imaums; that God sent seven Lawgivers, who in the interval of their appearance had each seven Helpers, and that each of these had Twelve Apostles. It appears that in 1150 ^A.D. the Sultan of Egypt recognised the grades of the Society, for when a special rank was created for the learned Jewish physician Maimonides, it is added that the enlightened men of the kingdom were divided into seven grades, each occupying a corresponding position near the throne.

Before the year 1090 ^A.D., one of the Dais of the House of Wisdom admitted an Aspirant of the name of Hassan ibn Sabbah, who thus details his conversion: “I had been reared, like my fathers, in the doctrine of the Twelve Imams, but I made the acquaintance of an Ishmaelite Rafeek named Emir Dhareb, with whom I knit fast the bonds of friendship. My opinion was that the tenets of the Ishmaelites resembled those of the Philosophers and that the Ruler of Egypt was a man who had been initiated into them.” Hassan developed his own initiatory system based on the House of Wisdom’s Nine degrees and the ritual usage of hashish. At Alamut he founded the Society of Assassins {Hashishiyya} in seven degrees, the Class of Fidayeen being those devoted to the main object, the assassination of the enemies of the order.

Masonic scholars Yarker and von Hammer maintain that Neophytes of the Order of Saint John, and Knights Templar were Initiates of the Cairo House of Wisdom, and the resemblance is peculiar, as each society had secret receptions, similar government, and each society favored white and red garments. That they had a secret reception is beyond doubt, and one of their maxims was that ‘secrecy is the soul of the order.’

German alchemist Basil Valentine claimed ownership of a Cipher Manuscript in 1374 that mentions a Fraternitas Rosae Crucis, as 1378 was a year the formation of the Rosy Cross Fraternity was attributed to the mythic Christian RosenKruetz, widely agreed to be a pen names for JohannValentin Andreae and Francis Bacon who contributed to the literary masterpieces of the Fama Fraternitatis, and Confessio. Traces of Rosicrucian heritage appear concurrently with other societies related esoterically to Free-Masonry. There are traces in 1484 of a Rosicrucian Order at Sleswick, in Denmark called Fraternitatus Rosarii Sleswicii. A Society termed Militia Crucifera Evangelica held a meeting at Lunenberg in 1571, and a Society called the Friends of the Cross, meeting in the Netherlands, is said to have joined an operative Lodge of Free-Masons before the year 1726.

In the year 1614 two manifestos entitled the Confessio Fraternitatis, and Fama Fraternitatis appeared in Kassal, Germany declaring the anonymous existence of a Rosicrucian Fraternity. The Manifestos were influenced by Lutheran theology, Carpocratian Gnosticism, and by respected hermetic philosopher Heinrich Khunrath, of Hamburg, author of Amphitheatrum Sapientiae Aeternae (1609).

These manifestos relate the travels of a certain Christian Rosenkreutz, across the Fertile Crescent at the end of the 14th century, who was Initiated at Damascus, Syria into the Secret Wisdom of the Arabians, Chaldeans, and Gymnosophists by Sufi and Zoroastrian Adepts; then after visiting Egypt and Morocco, he returned to Germany, where he established a small fraternity, which was to be continued secretly for 120 years, each brother, before he died, to appoint his successor.

At the close of 120 years, alterations were undertaken in their temple of the Holy Ghost, when his remains were found intact with a Liber T in his hand. All the paraphernalia and instruments were there necessary to constitute the Order. The work informs us that they had received the Order from the Arabians, Sufis, and Zoroastrian Adepts as the Fertile Crescent has always been fertile for mystic fraternities and the Authentic Heritage.

The English leader of the Society was Dr. Robert Fludd, a student of Kabbalah, Astrology, Alchemy, and Magic. He published at Leyden, in 1616, his Rosicrucian Apologia Compendiaria, after a visit that Michael Maier paid to England. In 1629 appeared he published his Summum Bonum, and Sophia Cum Moria Certamen, answering a Father Mersenne as to where the Rosicrucians resided, he writes, “In the house of God, where Christ is the Corner stone, a spiritual work, in which men are the living stones.” He speaks in 1633 “of the formerly so-called Rosicrucians who are now known as Sapientes, Sophoi, or Wise men.” (Apologia Compendiaria, Leyden, 1616).

Dr. John Dee, John Booker, William Lilly, and Father Backhouse are well known Occultists; Masons are more interested in two men who were not only given to the Rosie-Croix tradition concurrent with Masonic lodges, but were also well known Ancient and Free-Masons of Scotland, Sir Robert Moray, received a Mason at Newcastle-on-Tyne in 1641; and Elias Ashmole, received as a Mason at Warrington in 1646.

Occult researcher Jean-Pierre Bayard Rosie Croix enthused Masonic rites surfaced at the end of 18th century, the Rectified Scottish Rite, widespread in Central Europe where there was a strong presence of the “Golden and Rosy Cross,” and the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, first practiced in France, in which the 18th degree is called Knight of the Rose Croix (Les Rose-Croix, M. A. Editions, Paris, 1986).

Masonic scholars Robert Vanloo and Hans Schick impart that earlier 17th century Rosicrucianism had a influence considerable influence on Anglo-Saxon Masonry. Schick imparts the works of Jan Amos Komenský (Comenius, mentioned earlier; b.1592–d.1670) influence of a newly born English Masonry before the foundation of the Grand Lodge in 1717.

Adepts of the Gold und Rosenkreuzer (Golden and Rosy Cross) believe the Rosie Croix Society was founded by Egyptian “Ormusse” (Latin, Ormus) or “Licht-Weise” who immigrated to Scotland with the name “Builders from the East.” Then the original Order disappeared and was resurrected, in theory, by Oliver Cromwell as Antient and Accepted Free-Masonry. Ormus was an Alexandrian Gnostic sage named and his six followers were converted by one of Jesus’ disciples, Mark. Their symbol was said to be a red cross surmounted by a rose, thus the designation of Rosy Cross.

The legendary Origins of English Masonry that are a critical part of the Heritage, in our collective story, stem from the times of Edwin and Athelstan repeating a tradition that traces the Society to Egypt, synchronizing its derivation and formation. The Statuts de Ratisbonne (pub.1498) marked a transition of operative into speculative Masonry in France. Lodge Mother Kilwinning, the Mother Lodge of Scottish Masonry traces its origins into the Middle Ages of the 12^th century.

Under the reign of James II King of the Socts, the lodge at Kilwinning was granting warrants for the formation of lodges elsewhere in Scotland such as, Canongate Kilwinning, Greenock Kilwinning, and Cumberland Kilwinning. In 1736, the Grand Lodge of Scotland was chartered and the Kilwinning lodge was chartered as a constituent lodge. Lodge Mother Kilwinning records state from 1642-1656 that the Lodge consisted of Fellow Crafts or Masters and Apprentices.

During Scottish Commonwealth times, from 1649-1660, Speculative Masonry had no Lodge minutes of any antiquity in England, as they had in Scotland. Because of the scarcity of the material to be found in such minutes, Speculative Lodges depended upon the Masters’ Charters and a uncertainty whether the Rites of Scotland and England were identical, having been united in olden days. Jews were readmitted in Cromwell’s time, and Catholic accusations in France alleged that he founded English Masonry. In 1655, the London Company dropped the title of ‘Free’ I assume because there existed independent Guilds of Free-Masons. In 1646, Frater Elias Ashmole was made a Mason at Warrington Lodge, and the majority of the members present were not operative Masons.

Notices and manuscripts of Free-Masonry printed in England during the reign of Charles II reveal that small Lodges remained scattered throughout the country, independent from the other, but with a copy of the old Constitutions as its right of Assembly, and a formal ceremony of reception. All Trades were admissible, and gentlemen affect their company. The Speculative element was becoming, or already, predominant in independent English Lodges.

Free-Masonry is nothing more than an ambiguous collection of Judaic occult sources; rearranged, edited, and invented at different periods during the Middle Ages, when the Fraternity of Masons in England, Scotland, and Ireland were an operative fellowship comprised of architects and a few professional tradesmen of rank and repute accepted into the association as patrons or honorary brethren.

Now, the focus shifts away from the speculative history of Free-Masonry’s origins toward working knowledge of the development of the Lodge Craft in our modern era. We can say with certainty that the Masonry that penetrated across Europe in the centuries leading to the formation of the Grand Lodge of England in 1717 was Operative. The Jewish network of Freemasonry that assails and guards the Invisible College at present is wholly a Speculative Science.

When the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons was chartered on Saint John the Baptist’s Day in 1717, the Operative character of Free-Masonry was diminished, followed by the charter of the Grand Lodge of Scotland nineteen years later, all Grand Lodges adopted Speculative Freemasonry. This transition was not instantaneous, the mechanism of Operative Free-Masonry derived from the Guilds of Medieval Architects.

It was a gradual philosophic and solicitous approach that Operative holds in the lodges were deemphasized. General Lodge Regulations were not organized until four years after the charter of the Grand Lodge of England, applicable to purely Speculative Masonic obligations, additionally; no Operative Free-Mason was elected Grand Master most seemingly retired involuntarily or voluntarily from Lodge prominence.

Grand Lodges by 1923 had assumed an entirely Speculative character impart to the influence of three scholars; Dr. James Anderson a clergyman, philosopher John Theophilus Desaguliers, and antiquarian George Payne. Dr. Anderson enables the assertion in our research that Four Operative Lodges were extant in London by year 1716. These Lodges in 1717 were chartered in the organization of the Speculative Grand Lodge of England, the Operative Lodges of Edinburgh and Kilwinning ended their rivalry and chartered the Grand Lodge of Scotland in 1736.

The history of the formation of the first Speculative Freemason Lodge is given by Dr. Anderson in his own words:

“King George I.. entered London most magnificently on 20 Sept. 1714, and after the rebellion was over, A.D. 1716, the few Lodges at London, finding themselves neglected by Sir Christopher Wren, thought fit to cement under a Grand Master as the centre of union and harmony, the Lodges that met –

1. At the Goose and Gridiron Ale-House in St. Paul’s Church- yard
2. At the Crown Ale-House in Parker’s Lane near Drury
3. At the Apple Tree Tavern in Charles Street, Covent
4. At the Rummer and Grapes Tavern in Channel Row, Westminster.

They and some old brothers met at the said Apple Tree, and having put into the chair the oldest Master Mason (now the Master of a Lodge) they constituted themselves a Grand Lodge, pro tempore, in Due Form, and forthwith revived the Quarterly Communication of the Officers of Lodges (called the Grand Lodge) resolved to hold the Annual Feast and then to choose a Grand Master from among themselves, till they should have the honour of a noble brother at their head.

Accordingly, on Saint John Baptist’s Day, in the 3d year of King George I., A.D. 1717, the Assembly and Feast of the Free and Accepted Masons was held at the foresaid Goose and Gridiron Ale-house. Before dinner, the oldest Master Mason (now the Master of a Lodge) in the Chair, proposed a list of proper candidates, and the brethren by a majority of hands elected Mr. Anthony Sayer, Gentleman, Grand Master of Masons

{Capt. Joseph Elliott, Mr. Jacob Lamball, Carpenter, Grand Wardens}, who being forthwith invested with the badges of office and power by the said oldest Master, and installed, was duly congratulated by the Assembly who paid him the homage. Sayer, Grand Master, commanded the Masters and Wardens of Lodges to meet the Grand Officers every quarter in communication at the place appointed in his summons sent by the Tyler.” (Mackey’s Revised History of Freemasonry Vol. III 1921)

The United Grand Lodge of England was chartered 1813 suggesting the close of Craft Freemasonry in England as a Christian association. The Charter was a reconciliation between two contesting Masonic bodies; the first, the Grand Lodge of England whose origins in 1917 we have just briefly surveyed, the second, Grand Lodge of the Ancient was also known as Atholl Masons, headed by Lord Atholl.

The Atholls elected their first Grand Master on December 5, 1753, their membership at that time consisting largely of Irish Free-Masons. The Duke of Sussex, elected Grand Master annually until his death in 1843, declared freemasonry universal and removed all Christian references from the lectures and ritual. He encouraged appendant bodies and the Royal Arch to pursue a Christian course but maintained the universality of the three Craft degrees.

With the Charter of the United Grand Lodge of England it became necessary for the sister Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland to be assured that the speculative endeavor sanctioned by the new Free and Accepted Masonic Body was in conformity with their own. Accordingly, at the end of 1814 there took place at Freemasons’ Hall historic meetings between the Duke of Sussex, the Duke of Leinster, Grand Master of Ireland and Lord Kinnaird, the Grand Master of Scotland, in alignment with brethren from the three Grand Lodges, the, eight resolutions that form the International Compact were unanimously agreed upon.

The modernization of Free-Masonry in the United Kingdom, the Mother Lodges and her sisters provisioned for a fraternal intercourse and communion that would enable Free & Accepted Masonry to spread throughout the European royal houses and overseas to Canada, and the new United States. Canadian Freemasons are indebted to many Military Lodges of the 18^th century French Indian Wars for the spread of Freemasonry in the country.

The first civilian Canadian Masonic lodge was the Annapolis Royal, NS, Lodge, warranted from The Moderns Lodge in Boston in June 1738. Thirty Canada West and Québec lodges coalesced together under a charter in 1855 to form the Grand Lodge of Canada.

The “Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of British Columbia” was founded in Victoria, British Columbia, consecrated and dedicated on December 26th, 1871. Israel Wood Powell was elected first national Grand Master. The history of Freemasonry and the United States of America are inseparable and irrevocably linked together.

The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite is one of the appendant bodies of Freemasonry open to a Master Mason to further his reception of Freemasonry’s theology. The thirty-three degrees of the Scottish Rite existed in derive previous degree systems, amalgamated from Memphis-Misraïm and York Rites, the Scottish Rite did not charter until the warrant of the Mother Supreme Council at Charleston, South Carolina, in May 1801 was organized.

Isaac De Costa was a deputy commissioned to charter Estienne Morin’s 25 Rites of the Royal Secret in other countries, formed constituent bodies of the Rite in South Carolina in 1783, which eventually became, in 1801, The Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction. All regular American Scottish Rite bodies presently derive their heritage from the A.ˑ.A.ˑ.S.ˑ.R.ˑ.SJ. Daniel D. Tompkins was chosen as its first Sovereign Grand Commander. Tompkins was later elected Vice President of the United States, under President and Freemason, Frater James Monroe, in 1816.

Roman Catholicism’s position on Free-Masonry has nearly equal social and political influence in European history and American politics. Roman Catholic Canon does not prohibit membership in Masonic Lodges, but the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, once headed by H.H. Pope Benedict XVI as Josef Cardinal Ratzinger, forbids it. We have the following edicts from the Holy See concerning Freemasonry:

“Condemnation of the Society, Lodges, Conventicles of LIBERI MURATORI, or Freemasons, under pain of excommunication to be incurred ipso facto, and absolution from it being reserved for the Supreme Pontiff, except at point of death.”
– Bull, In Eminenti, Pope Clement XII, April 28 1738.

“Those who join a Masonic sect or other societies of the same sort, which plot against the Church or against legitimate civil authority, incur ipso facto an excommunication simply reserved to the Holy See.”
– Canon 2335 of The Code of Canon Law, promulgated 27 May 1917; effective 19 May 1918. {1963 LoCCN: 63-22295}

“Bishops have asked this Sacred Congregation about the extent and interpretation of Canon 2335 of the Code of Canon Law which prohibits Catholics, under pain of excommunication, to join masonic associations, or similar associations…Taking particular cases into consideration, it is essential to remember that the penal law has to be interpreted in a restrictive sense. For this reason, one can certainly point out, and follow, the opinion of those writers who maintain that Canon 2335 affects only those Catholics who are members of associations that indeed conspire against the Church.”
– {Cardinal Franjo Seper, Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Correspondence to Cardinal John Krol 19 July 1974.}

“The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, on 19th July 1974, wrote a letter to some Bishops’ Conferences, for their attention only, concerning the interpretation of Can. 2335, which forbids Catholics under pain of excommunication from enrolling in the Masonic sect and other associations of the same type:

Excellent sir, many Bishops have sought to know from this Congregation what the weight and interpretation of Can. 2335 is which forbids under pain of excommunication Catholics from enrolling in Masonic associations and other (associations) of the same sort.

In the course of a longer examination of this question, the Holy See has many times consulted Bishops’ Conferences on matters of particular interest, in order to know better the nature of these associations and their present-day birth and the opinion of the Bishops.

The great divergence of responses, however, which evidences different situations in each nation, does not allow the Holy See to change the general legislation hitherto in force, which therefore remains in vigour until a new canon law from the competent Pontifical Commission of the Code of Canon Law for the recognition of public law comes into force.

But in considering particular cases, we must keep before our eyes the fact that penal law is to undergo strict interpretation. Therefore, the opinion can safely be taught and applied of those authors who hold that the aforementioned canon 2335 concerns only those Catholics who enroll in associations that really do plot against the Church.

However, the prohibition remains in all cases on clerics, religious and members of secular instituted from enrolling in any masonic associations. Yours, connected in the Lord, {sic}

Because the above-cited letter, after being made public, made possible false and captious interpretations, this Congregation, without prejudice to any future revision of the CIC, confirms and declares the following:

1. 1. The canonical rules, insofar as they pertain to the question under consideration, are in no way changed, and therefore retain their full

1. 1. Consequently, neither the excommunication not the other penalties provided is abrogated.

1. 1. The elements in the above-mentioned letter which concern the interpretation of the canon in question are to be accepted (as was the intention of the Sacred Congregation) only as an appeal to general principles for interpreting penal laws for the resolution of cases involving individual people which can fall under the judgment of the Ordinary of the place. But it was not the intention of the Sacred Congregation that the ability be demanded from the Episcopal Conferences of publicly bringing forth judgment of a general character on the nature of masonic associations that involves derogations from the aforementioned rules.”
    - {Rome, from the Office of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Feb. 17, 1981}

“While the former excommunication of Catholics who joined Masonic societies has not been repeated in this Code, a sanction can be imposed on those who join associations that work against the Church, and an interdict can be placed on those who promote or run such groups. Whether Masons fall within these strictures must now be determined by authorities within the particular churches.”
– {Commentary to The Code of Canon Law; 27 November 1983.}

“It has been asked whether there has been any change in the Church’s decision concerning Masonic associations since the new Code of Canon Law does not mention them expressly, unlike the previous code. This sacred congregation is in a position to reply that this circumstance is due to an editorial criterion that was followed also in the case of other associations likewise unmentioned inasmuch as they are contained in wider categories.

Therefore, the Church’s negative judgment concerning Masonic associations remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and, therefore, membership in them remains forbidden. The faithful, who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion.

It is not within the competence of local ecclesiastical authorities to give a judgment on the nature of Masonic associations that would imply derogation from what has been decided above, and this in line with the declaration of this sacred congregation issued Feb. 17, 1981. In an audience granted to the undersigned cardinal prefect, the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II approved and ordered the publication of this declaration that had been decided in an ordinary meeting of this sacred congregation.”

– Rome, from the Office of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Nov. 26, 1983 English translation from Latin. Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Prefect. Father Jerome Hamer, O.P., Titular Archbishop of Lorium, Secretary.
“Declaration of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith”; 26 November 1983.

I am not a fan of modern Freemasons or Freemasonry as a whole. Unlike Guénon who considered them originally to have been an authentic initiatic current (probably because he was himself originally a Martinist), I look at Freemasonry as a distant echo of the Pythagorean-Platonic (i.e. Hermetic) initiatic currents that prevailed openly and then in secret for centuries. Their “secret teachings of all ages” are readily available in much more authentic forms elsewhere particularly in the Corpus Hermeticum and many genuine alchemical texts.

The Black Sun is Logos, not Chaos. God is the Void that binds all things. The talmudic sorcerors are the lords of all agents of ruin. We are living in the timeline of their defeat, however the more things change the more they stay same.

Manly Palmer Hall informed us, “Freemasonry is a fraternity within a fraternity, an outer organization concealing an inner brotherhood of the elect.” The speculative history of Free- Masonic York, Scottish, Memphis-Misraïm Rites, Rosy Cross Fraternity, and all appendent Masonic Bodies is interdependent. The external fellowships I cite are part of International Jewry.

There are the spiritual enemy of the one Invisible School, an Authentic Heritage of Kings and Warriors, Musicians, Composers, Artists, Scientists, Architects, and Philosophers; an ancient blood heritage and bond with our Volk we all share.

“Evola speaks of a global conspiracy that will overcome Judaism and would include non-human elements. He mentions a Prince of Darkness. And in this he is right. After all, what are the Jungian Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious?

They are inhuman entities. The ancients called them Gods and Demons. And what is the Collective Unconscious? It is the “Memory of the Blood,” or rather, a “memory that goes through the blood,” that acts on earth by means of the blood.

“It is not the “light of the Akashic Archives,” but of another universe. The Akashic Archives belong to the Enemy. If the Hyperborean Memory of the Blood can be penetrated, then the Voice would awake and recover the Vril, thus breaking the Eternal Return. For this Shastriya, Brahamanic and Esoteric Hitlerist India aims to conserve the purity of the blood, to be able to “remember” more effectively and win the Great War.”
– Miguel Serrano

The GameStop Insurrection

Chinese Coronavirus Revisited: How China Wrought the Black Plague On Europe

Homosexuality in Nationalist and Identitarian Movements